Anyone who has been involved in Orthodoxy in America will likely have seen much discourse (often polemical in nature) about the ânous.â In fact, the nous plays a pivotal role in anti-western polemics since it has become a trope that âthe West doesnât have a concept of the nous.â Accordingly, the nous functions as a type of secret thing you can onlyâŚ
Christianity emerges as a system of interacting with understanding the world, described in teachings and lived by the actual human persons of every era. This way of thinking and seeing has been bred into the bones of every person born in the West for centuries, though today it may go unnoticed like the air which we breathe.
The following article was originally published on the Roads from Emmaus weblog in March of 2011. It has been revised for this publication. An encounter by my wife with a Unitarian Universalist has set me thinking again upon what I believe is one of the great Christian evangelistic questions of our time: We now have to make the case for dogma. WeâŚ
A fellow pro-life friend of mine recently sent me a post by the theologically and politically liberal Christian writer Fred “Slactivist” Clark in favor of abortion titled The âbiblical viewâ thatâs younger than the Happy Meal. It begins this way: In 1979, McDonaldâs introduced the Happy Meal. Sometime after that, it was decided that the Bible teaches that human life begins atâŚ
Dean Obeidallah, a Muslim and professional comedian, recently opined for CNN in “Where are the good Christians?” on his longing for a Christianity he would prefer. The title caught my eye, as it suggests not only that there is a clearly defined line between âgoodâ and âbadâ Christians but also that this author knows where this line is and feels itâs obviousâŚ