I’ve got this new post up today at Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy that may be of interest to readers. I reflect a bit on my own childhood in Evangelical revivalism as well as talking about how that culture functions and why I regard Orthodoxy to have more satisfying answers to revivalist longings.
Seventeenth Sunday after Pentecost, September 30, 2012 In the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, one God. Amen. âYou are a temple of the living God.â We hear these words today from St. Paulâs second epistle to the Corinthians, and they are followed by exhortations from Paul, quoting from the Old Testament, that the Christians of CorinthâŠ
As you probably can tell, I’ve mainly been focusing my weblogging energy into the new Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy weblog. Forgive my neglect here. I’m still working out the balance of the kinds of work I plan to do there and here. In any event, in case you don’t happen to be a reader over there yet (and why not?), I thought I’d update youâŠ
One of the criticisms of Orthodoxyâs understanding of its own history (not to mention, Roman Catholicismâs) is that there really is no unbroken Christian tradition of anything at all, that Church history is really just about multiple movements, doctrines and practices that cannot coherently be traced back to the Apostles. This is essentially one version of the historiography of the anti-ecclesiologists. If there isâŠ
Not that I watch awards shows more than perhaps once every five years or so (and I didn’t see this one, either), but I’m going to go out on a limb and say that this is the first time that Orthodox Christian monastic enclave Mount Athos was mentioned in an Emmy speech. This is Jonathan Jackson winning his fifth Emmy. Readers may recall myâŠ
…we are supposed to act with great deference to natural rhythms and patterns when it comes to nature âout there,â but extendâby government fiat, if necessaryâthe greatest possible technological control over human reproductive rhythms and patterns. We should learn to live with and in nature out there, but conquer nature in here. To what can one attribute this fundamental contradiction? Peter J. Deneen, âForwardââŠ
I’ve got a new post up at Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy that continues our series on ecclesiology. This one is entitled Who’s not a Christian? It examines the question of how different Christian communions see each other’s legitimacy.
One of the perhaps most pressing theological questions of our time and place is answered beautifully in this post from Jim John Marks: The question is not âwhy canât God love me the way I amâ, the question is âwhy canât I love God the way I amâ. And it is the pursuit of the answer to that question which opens the door toâŠ
