Geneva Bible Compared With Orthodox Study Bible

                    Third of a four part review of the Geneva Bible ¬† ¬† ¬† Part 1¬† ¬† ¬† ¬†Part 2 Study bibles do more than help the reader understand the Bible, they also shape the reader‚Äôs theology according to a particular faith tradition.¬† This can be seen in the Geneva Bible and the Orthodox Study Bible.¬† I will show this by laying out‚Ķ

Calvin Dissing the Fathers

¬†                   In an earlier blog posting ‚ÄúPlucking the TULIP,‚ÄĚ I marshaled an array of patristic citations showing that a wide range of early church fathers affirmed human free will: Irenaeus of Lyons, Cyril of Jerusalem, John of Damascus, John of the Ladder, Gregory of Nyssa et al.¬† I did this to show that the theological consensus of the early Church refuted the Calvinist‚Ķ

John Calvin on Incense

  Protestant visitors to the Orthodox Liturgy are often surprised by the abundance of images in the sanctuary.  Where Orthodox churches have icons all over, Reformed churches shun icons having only bare walls.  Another surprise for the Protestant visitor is the smell of incense when the priest comes out swinging his censer.  Aside from the smell of the ink on the bulletin or from the bible in their hands Protestant churches are…

A Protestant Exodus? ‚Äď My Response to Peter Leithart

  In Rev. Peter Leithart’s recent column for First Things: ‚ÄúThe tragedy of conversion‚ÄĚ (7 October 2013), he describes as tragic Protestants who acquired the taste for ‚Äúcatholicity and unity‚ÄĚ and instead of remaining Protestant go so far as to convert to the Orthodox Church or to Rome.¬† This is a crisis affecting Protestantism in general and the Federal Vision movement in particular. ¬†The New York Times published an article in 2009‚Ķ

Are Conversions to Orthodoxy Tragic? A Response to Leithart

Folks, ¬† Today’s posting contains Gabe Martini’s excellent response to Peter Leithart. ¬†I will be uploading my response to Rev. Leithart shortly. ¬†Robert   Are conversions to Orthodoxy tragic? This is a¬†continuing notion¬†from Leithart and other, similar Protestants, who have adopted certain aspects of the Catholic tradition while refusing to adopt the fullness of the Body of Christ. This it not to say (at all) that Dr. Leithart is not a Christian,‚Ķ

Geneva Bible and the City on a Hill

  Part 2¬†of 4. Parts¬†1,¬†¬†3, and ¬†4. One striking feature about the recent promotions of the Geneva Bible is the reworking of church history.¬† They depict a tyrannical King James who oppressed freedom loving Puritans and how the Geneva Bible played a pivotal role in the emergence of democracy in America, but history is more complicated than that.   The website for claims: The notes also infuriated King James, since they‚Ķ

In Defense of ‚ÄúPlucking the TULIP‚ÄĚ: A Response to Jacob Aitken

¬† On 8 August 2013, Jacob Aitken, the administrator for Reformed Principia aka Bayou Huguenot aka Outlaw Presbyterianism, posted what he claims to be a rebuttal of my article: ‚ÄúPlucking the TULIP: Part I.‚ÄĚ ¬†PDF file. See Aitken’s¬†Responding to Orthodox Bridge: Part One. ¬†Below is my response to him.   TULIP = Calvinism? Jacob Aitken writes: Arakaki identifies Calvinism with TULIP with Predestination.¬† In doing so he is operating off of the‚Ķ