The Morality of Christmas

Morality is tricky business in what is an extremely moral society. I pray my readers to be patient with me as I explain what I think is the problem. First, I will note that morality is all that is left when the most fundamental grounds of a culture have been destroyed. We indeed live in just such a time, hence the rise of a vehemence in the moral life. Second, I will suggest that what we as Christians must strive for within ourselves is less and less of a moral grounding in our lives and a greater grounding in that which is – all of which requires some explaining.

Two men building a fence along the edge of a cliff will not have an argument about which side to stand on as they do their work. Gravity presents its own argument and its word is final. Indeed, it is not an argument – it is real. This is the nature of Christian moral claims. But our modern world has altered this understanding.

Today, we use the term “moral” to describe behaviors that adhere to some particular standard or guide. As such, everybody is “moral” and lives according to some form of morality. People do not behave in a random manner. Everyone has thoughts and opinions about their own behavior and the behavior of others (no matter how much they may say otherwise). Those thoughts and opinions need not be based in anything other than opinions and feelings – indeed, most morality in our modern world has no other basis. And this is the point.

The Christian understanding of morality is not arbitrary in the least. There is nothing in the whole of the faith’s teaching whose ground is simply “God said so.” Nothing within the Christian moral life is arbitrary. What God commands is our good and He directs us according to the goodness of our existence and the creation in which we live.

If anyone asks the reason for any action within the Christian life, a good answer, rooted in our own well-being and the well-being of others should be forthcoming. The commandments of Christ do not simply tell us what we should do, but in their telling, reveal the very nature of reality to us.

The so-called breakdown of morality in the modern world is not a moral problem. What has broken down is not morality, but any agreed notion about the nature of the world. Our perceptions of reality itself have shattered into disparate fragments. And there is a strange aching for morality, a tormented desire for goodness in some form or guise. But as the ground of reality has shattered, so has the possibility of moral conversation. We shout in hopes of being heard.

When we lose a common understanding of reality itself, all that is left is bald assertion. The morality of the modern world is simply power. It is, in one form or another, the use of violence (or its threat) that argues. Certain positions and behaviors are extolled while others are not only condemned but increasingly demonized. In the baseless morality of modernity, those with whom we disagree are not simply wrong: they are evil. This is the only conclusion that can be reached when what is right is established solely through choice. If what is good is only good because I choose it, then choosing otherwise must be seen as evil and named as such.

Classical Christianity, on the other hand, need demonize no one. No human being can ever be the “enemy” (Eph. 6:12). What is right and what is true is not a matter of choice – it is established by reality itself. In our modern setting, many (even most) will argue with the nature and character of reality. Some will even assert that reality is nothing more than a social construct. However, if something is true because it is real, then it ultimately makes its own argument. You don’t have to defend gravity.

In the confusion of our present times, however, it is easy to overlook the true morality that God and creation uphold. An absolutely essential element of that reality is expressed in the mystery of Christmas. God becomes a man and is birthed into our world. This reveals human beings as bearers of the image of God and dictates the very reason for the manner we are commanded to treat others. More than this, the Incarnation of Christ reveals the reality of life-as-communion (indeed, the whole work of Christ makes this known). It tells us that when we harm another, we not only harm the image of God, but we, in fact, do harm to our own selves.

St. Paul appeals to this understanding when he speaks about marriage:

So husbands ought to love their own wives as their own bodies; he who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as the Lord does the church. For we are members of His body, of His flesh and of His bones. (Eph 5:28-30)

This same reality is revealed in Christ’s statement: “Inasmuch as you have done it unto the least of these my brethren, you did it unto me” (Matt. 25:40). It is very much worth pondering that Christ does not say that what we do to others is “as if” we had done it to Him. No. He reveals the utter Divine solidarity of the Incarnation. He is the other – each of them, everywhere and always. This reality undergirds the whole of His “ethical” teaching. To love as Christ loves begins with recognizing Him in the fullness of the Incarnation.

Tragically, modern versions of morality, rooted in the will (elevating free choice to the primary position within all things), are always moving towards violence. There is nothing to which one can point other than “my choice,” to justify anything. And my choice only has power when I am willing to exercise the violence required to give it power. The more our culture moves towards the morality of the will, the more violent and coercive it will become.

The Incarnation of Christ is without violence (on the part of God). There is no coercion. From the beginning, Mary is asked and yields herself to be the mother of the Savior with joy. All that is endured, up to and including the Cross are freely accepted and not coerced. But the coming of Christ is not strange for creation – it does not even offer the violence required of accommodation. St. John says of Christ, “He came to His own people.” The world was created through Christ, the Logos, and bears His image within all things. Far from doing violence, His coming reveals things to be what they truly are. All things find their true home in Him.

This is the morality of Christmas – all things becoming what they truly are.  This is peace on earth and good will towards all of mankind.

 

About Fr. Stephen Freeman

Fr. Stephen is a priest of the Orthodox Church in America, Pastor Emeritus of St. Anne Orthodox Church in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. He is also author of Everywhere Present and the Glory to God podcast series.



Posted

in

by

Comments

137 responses to “The Morality of Christmas”

  1. Esmée La Fleur Avatar

    John – I recently read a really wonderful book titled A Layman in the Desert by Daniel Opperwall. I have mentioned it in the comments under several previous blog posts by Fr. Freeman, so I won’t describe it in detail again here. All I will say is that it addresses your question and provides the answer you are seeking. I found this book to be so helpful to me that I bought a copy for my priest who had not yet read it. May God bless you on your journey!

  2. Esmée La Fleur Avatar

    Christopher – these excerpts from the excellent book The Theology of Illness by Jean-Claude Larchet speak to your question…

    “Saint Gregory of Nyssa offers the following explanation. When God created man inthe beginning, he did not create an individual but rather ‘the fullness of our nature;’ ‘by the divine foreknowledge and power, all of humanity is included in this act.’ God knew not only that Adam would sin and, as a consequence would procreate, but He knew as well, ‘He Who holds in His hands the limits of all things,’ ‘the limits of all things,’ ‘the exact number of all the individuals who would make up humanity as a whole.’ ‘Whereas the fullness of humanity had been foreordained by God’s foreknowledge, this same God –Whose governing authority orders and delimits all things exactly, and sees the future as the present — established in advance the time needed for the full constitution of the human race, such that the coming of souls in their predetermined number should determine the limit of time, and that the flow of time would cease once it were no longer needed to allow for the propagation of the human race.’ Accordingly, the end of time will come ‘with the fulfillment of human generation;’ ‘humanity will be transformed and, from its perishable, earthly state, will become imperishable and eternal’ once ‘the fullness of humanity shall arrive at its term according to divine foreknowledge, since the number of souls will no longer have to increase.’”

    “This is why the blessings stored up for us are not granted to us individually and immediately in there fullness. Rather, there is a delay in their bestowal as humanity awaits its growth to full stature, according to the possibility offered to each human hypostasis to be saved and deified.”

    p. 44

  3. Nicholas Stephen Griswold Avatar
    Nicholas Stephen Griswold

    John,
    It also may help you to know that Greek has two different words for life that are used in Scripture. One is Bios which refers to physical life and the other is Zoe which is Spiritual life. Our Bios comes to an end, but thanks to our Lord, our Zoe does not. Bios is not real life but, as scientists can show us, is mainly a very complicated series of chemical reactions. Our physical life comes to an end when our chemical reactions and physical properties are disrupted and no longer function properly. This could be due to disease, injury or simply old age where the system decays and breaks down. Our Zoe is from the Holy Spirit who is called the Zopion in the Nicene Creed. This noun is a compound noun made up of Zoe and Paeo which means to make or to do. This makes the Holy Spirit the maker or doer of Spiritual Life, which by God’s Grace is eternal life. In order to grasp what is actually being said in Scripture one has to know which word for life is used. An easy hint, it is almost always Zoe when the Lord speaks of life.
    Before the Resurrection when a person died their totality of life ended. Their souls entered into Hades, the Land of Shadows where they still existed but did not have the fullness of Zoe. When the Lord descended to this realm of Death, He filled Death with His Zoe and defeated/eradicated this temporary state of near non existence for the departed because Death could not contain His Zoe and continue to exist. Thus all are granted Eternal Life (Zoe) and more abundantly. Our bodies still break down, quit functioning , die and rot but our Zoe continues awaiting the Resurrection and Judgment. No longer a mere shade of life our souls enjoy the fullness of Zoe.
    Now the Lord never told us what this new life entails before the Resurrection even though we get glimpses in Scripture of those who have been well pleasing to the Lord. So it is impossible for us to be specific of all the facts and circumstances as we can only speculate and speculation beyond revelation is always equal to heresy. This may be another factor in why it is hard to grasp what is being said about Zoe and why our bodies die. The Lord left us why a Mystery and it takes Faith to accept that He promised us abundant Zoe and yet our bodies die. I don’t understand it in technical terms, but I trust Him and will lead my life accordingly.

  4. John Avatar
    John

    Father,

    Thank you. You write: “In His death on the Cross, Christ makes His death the means of destroying death. This, in turn, is the same path we ourselves travel. Every moment of every day …” This rings true to me. I do not participate in Christ’s death – or in his resurrected life – in some merely “spiritual” sense accomplished by participation in the mysteries (baptism, Eucharist) alone. Rather, I have the possibility of participating in it “every moment of every day” – in the time in between the mysteries – by choosing to pick up the cross and die to self. When I do that, whether it be in how I do my work, or how I relate to my wife or to my neighbor, that bit of my life – perhaps just that moment – has died and has risen with Christ in His new life.

    Does that sound right?

    It is amazing how easy and habitual it is for me to read the second part of that Philippians passage as precisely an exhortation to moral exercise/discipline, and as efficacious only inasmuch as I am successful in the moral undertaking. It’s mind-blowing to see it the other way around: that the blamelessness and lack of complaining mentioned are the fruit of dying with Christ, and thus of His life in me. I don’t strive to “not complain” because I’m trying to be “good”; I die with Christ, and therefore don’t complain!

    I feel like I’m just beginning to see something I’ve wanted to see for a long time… Thank you, Father. I’ll look forward to the second part of your answer :).

    (Of course, seeing is one thing.. Doing is another, and harder, thing. Easy to sit here and write comments on a blog. Harder to actually die to self. Cause, you know – death hurts.)

  5. John Avatar
    John

    Christopher and Dino, thank you for your replies as well. Christopher – yes, I think “learning to live with the ambiguity” is something I very much need. And Dino, I think you said in one sentence what it took me a whole comment to try to get to.

  6. Esmée La Fleur Avatar

    Nicholas – Thank you so very very much for that detailed explanation of the difference between the two Greek words for life. Absolutely fascinating. I wish I could learn Biblical Greek in order to have a clearer understanding of the New Testament Scriptures.

  7. Dee of St Hermans Avatar
    Dee of St Hermans

    Fr Stephen,
    Is it appropriate to believe that Christ not only ‘changed’ death but ‘birth’ as well, perhaps in the Mystery of the Incarnation? Am I conflating things too much?

  8. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    John,

    ‘Death hurts’ sounds like a reasonable adage. But let’s clarify that it is love we are talking about: the dying to self.
    A person that has decided to love has decided to die to self. Once the decision is taken –truly taken– what is difficult is revealed to be the most natural thing.
    The conventional secular (or ‘secularized Christian’) life, understandably finds being slandered, or in pain, to be a particularly difficult thing to bear without an ‘ego reaction’. The life in Christ, however, is so exclusively fixated/decided upon union-with-Him-no-matter-what, that it finds these trying occasions as the best possible opportunities to better manifest what is bubbling inside of the ardently-in-love soul. Such a decision inflames the fire of the soul for fasting, night-vigil, ascesis, forgiveness, prayer, self-renunciation. All these become fervent joys – of varying measures in each soul.
    There is no need for despondence when we see that we fall short though… Just for further inspiration to make a new start. It is that simple. Again and again.
    There is no doubt at all that, to the measure that a person strives in these things, they hear the voice that witnesses loudly within them that: they are God’s son or God’s daughter.

  9. John Avatar
    John

    Dino,

    Your words are like drops of dew watering the hard soil of my soul. I pray that they sink in fully. Yes, it is ego and my fear of pain that avoid the death to self whenever the opportunity for it presents itself. If I could see love in the center of that death to self – a love so beautiful that it pulls in and calms all worry of how this death will end up – then perhaps I can take the first steps, and then keep stepping.

    This love is itself fearful too – it hurts a bit too – but in a different way.

  10. John Avatar
    John

    Father Stephen, the follow up question for me is: If it is the death to self in all the little moments between the sacraments (after baptism, between reception of the Eucharist) that really, actually unite me to Christ’s death and thus resurrected life, then what do the sacraments actually do? Baptism unites me to Christ’s death and resurrection – but if I still have to die and rise again every moment of every day, are you sure baptism is needed? Why not just try to die a bit every day?

  11. Nicholas Stephen Griswold Avatar
    Nicholas Stephen Griswold

    Esmee,
    If I can learn Greek, you can. It is a matter of learning the alphabet, grammar rules and vocabulary and they have several very good versions of the Lexicon for Koine Greek and online sources. You may not ever get to the point of being able to pick up something written in Koine Greek and read it like you read English but you will be able to see the nuances in wording. http://www.greekbible.com is a great way to investigate wording. You can see the Greek text line by line and when yo put you cursor over a word it opens a box and defines the word and if you click on the word it it parses the verbs and declines the nouns so you know the function of each word. Greek noun endings tell you what each noun is doing in a sentence and saves you from diagramming a sentence like we have to in English.

  12. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    John,
    We cannot wait to take the first steps once we have ‘seen love in the centre of that death to self’.
    It is not love that we will start with. No; we have absolutely no idea what true love is like.
    Our first steps can be taken competently through seeing joy.

    Yes; it is joy we have to start with. Joy will become the fuel that will lead us to love.
    You lose some of your joy? That’s proof there’s a demon’s tail in there somewhere.
    Our adversary knows full well that joy produces fearlessness, and there’s only a few possibilities left for the enemy with which to fight a fearless, joyful Christian athlete – and these possibilities can be eliminated through the discernment of a spiritual guide.
    If, however, he can bring about significant despondency, in one way or another, consciously or even somewhat unconsciously, then the Christian becomes easy pray for a myriad of the adversary’s traps, in fact, he’ll probably need no adversary fighting him anymore at all: the believer himself will have atendency to become the slanderer of God!

  13. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    John,
    I think it would be helpful to understand that these things are not separate events. The moments of death to self (being alive to others) is not one thing and the Eucharist and Baptism another – they are all one and the same thing – living in union with the life of Christ. The life of Christ is a death-to-self-alive-to-others life. When we live in union with Him, His life does what it is. Every act of self-denying love is a Baptism into the death of Christ and a union with His resurrection. It is a union with His self-sacrificing death on the Cross and with His life-giving Body and Blood.

    This is why the concept of “mere” morality is so empty – and such a loss of the fullness of the faith.

  14. Drewster2000 Avatar
    Drewster2000

    John (if you’re still reading)

    I’m responding to your comment from December 7, 2017 at 9:25 am:

    Which is what gets me to this question: It’s not like heterosexual sex or heterosexual marriage is something in itself life-giving…

    It’s true, how do we judge at all? The answer is that we imitate the practice that God lays out for us – not just because He says so but because we know that is what leads us toward life. Fr. Stephen has famously said that Christ didn’t come to make bad men good but dead mean alive.

    We live out our lives no matter how painful instead of reverting to suicide because that will lead us toward life. We practice patience with others even when we’re being abused instead of losing our temper because that will help us become more truly alive. We follow heterosexual practices in marriage because that is the path which leads us to becoming more truly human and more truly male or female.

    All things are death to us in this fallen world, but we practice the particular methods of dying that Christ has shown us, because they lead to eternal life with Him.

  15. John Avatar
    John

    Father, understood, and that’s a helpful perspective. There is something special about the sacraments though, no? Some “extra” grace conferred on the recipient – or “the remission of sins” in the case of baptism? I think I understand when you say every act of death-to-self-alive-to-the-other is itself a baptism, and even the Eucharist – because Christ is there in that moment, in his death, resurrection, and life. But there seems to be something “extra” about the sacraments, else why would we have them. I would even want to say that I’ve experienced this “extra” grace myself, in that I notice when I haven’t communed in some time.

    I guess I’m asking, are the sacraments “special” vehicles for participating in Christ’s death and resurrection – do they confer or accomplish something that the day-to-day death to self doesn’t? And if so, why?

    Please forgive me if these questions are a nuisance. I usually stop asking after my first question because I feel too awkward to press the point. It is freeing to freely ask, but I hope it’s not a bother.

  16. Esmée La Fleur Avatar

    Nicholas – thank you for that link!

  17. Esmée La Fleur Avatar

    John – It’s my understanding (and Father can correct me if I am mistaken) that Baptism confers on us the grace of the Holy Spirit which then gives us the strength to practice the “dying to self” on a moment to moment basis in our daily lives.

  18. Paula Avatar
    Paula

    John…funny, but I wrote a lengthy response to your first question about Baptism, but didn’t post it. As I too am new to Orthodoxy, I read your question as asking about the efficacy of the rite of Baptism itself, a question that many of us have upon entering the Church. Upon reading your follow-up question I detect the same inquiry.
    It was after reading Dee’s question about Christ changing our ‘birth’ that I thought of your initial post. I thought about Jesus’s response to Nicodemus “unless one is born of water and the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God”. These words, as well as Jesus’s own Baptism, are the why the Church kept that particular rite, the immersion into water for cleansing. She further explains the fulfillment of that rite in Christ, which is over and above John’s (Baptist) baptism and really all the ritual cleansing done back in those days.
    It is not by any magical power nor does it lack any effectiveness (i.e. purely symbolic). It is that by Christ’s Incarnation He has redeemed (and is redeeming) the world unto Himself…meaning all created things….sanctified, set apart…meaning water itself as well. We call those waters “blessed”…the Priest blesses them, calling upon the Holy Spirit to do so. We are immersed in these blessed waters, to our death in Him, and rise to our life in Him. It is a rite that we enter into because of the redemption (of all creation) Christ purposed in His Incarnation, Death and Resurrection. It is efficacious because He made it so. We do not go any further by asking “how”. As Father said, by “mystery” it is not that we are to be ignorant…we already have the teachings….but that we partake by participation. That’s how I understand it, John. After all this I hope I understood your question properly!

  19. Nicholas Stephen Griswold Avatar
    Nicholas Stephen Griswold

    I hope that it helps you to understand more of what is really being said. I find English a poor theological language because of the limits of meanings in many words that we use.

  20. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    John,

    are the sacraments “special” vehicles for participating in Christ’s death and resurrection – do they confer or accomplish something that the day-to-day death to self doesn’t?

    the appropriation of the grace of the sacramental life is commensurate to the mystical life – personal day-to-day death to self enables true ownership of that grace of communal sacramental participation in Christ’s death and resurrection.

  21. learningtobestill2016 Avatar
    learningtobestill2016

    Nicholas Griswold – Your discussion of Bios and Zoe is interesting. How does the resurrection of the body fit in with that?

  22. Drewster2000 Avatar
    Drewster2000

    Fr. Stephen,

    The “Newer Comments” button doesn’t seem to be working. I had to click through one of the links in the Recent Comments section in order to get there.

  23. Nicholas Stephen Griswold Avatar
    Nicholas Stephen Griswold

    Learningtobestill2016
    The Lord never has provided details of what the resurrection of the body entails. We have a tantalizing vision of His resurrected body that bears the marks of His crucifixion and is solid to the touch. We are not given anything else to go on. I confident that Zoe is in view, because spiritual life is eternal life, but to hazard a guess on whether the body functions as before is to go beyond what is revealed. That act is one sure to end in heresy so I cannot say.

  24. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    John,
    The sacraments are normative in the life of grace and are the primary means of communion. Baptism/Chrismation is our initiation into the life of grace, and our union with Christ. The Eucharist, the communion of Christ’s Body and Blood, is our continuance in the same grace. The actions we perform are not “another thing” – but a continuation in the same. I don’t really want to make a huge distinction – only that if we walk in the grace of Christ’s self-emptying love, we will want the grace of communion in His Body and Blood. All of this is the ongoing life of Christ that is the Church. In the life in the Church we live in the fullness – not this thing but not that thing – but all things.

    If we say we have communion with him while we walk in darkness, we lie and do not live according to the truth; but if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have communion with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin. (1 Jn. 1:6-7)

    I have taken the liberty with the English translation of correcting the word “fellowship” (as its usually rendered) a giving it as the word “communion.” It is the Greek word “koinonia” that means communion. Fellowship no longer has the right meaning. Also, the reference to the “blood of Jesus” in this passage should not be abstracted and thought of as something apart from the Eucharist (as would commonly be done by a Protestant reader). There is no reason not to see this as a Eucharistic reference. The passage gives a wonderfully “whole” view of our life in Christ.

  25. Byron Avatar
    Byron

    the appropriation of the grace of the sacramental life is commensurate to the mystical life – personal day-to-day death to self enables true ownership of that grace of communal sacramental participation in Christ’s death and resurrection.

    My understanding is that the sacraments are the revealing of God and a sacramental life is the revealing of God in all our life (and all of Creation). The personal day-to-day death to self is the union with God that is our salvation. It is the sacramental life; the fulfillment of the sacraments in Creation. Forgive me if I have misspoke. Blessings.

  26. Eric Avatar

    “the reference to the “blood of Jesus” in this passage should not be abstracted and thought of as something apart from the Eucharist (as would commonly be done by a Protestant reader). There is no reason not to see this as a Eucharistic reference. The passage gives a wonderfully “whole” view of our life in Christ.”

    Thank you for this Father Stephen – I am slowly having to unlearn old ways of hearing the Word ‘off the surface’ as it were – this is yet another illuminating revealing of the Depth of the Faith. It puts me in mind of the title of a wonderful new book by a Protestant theologian but one who seems to be on a journey into something deeper, Hans Boersma, entitled ‘Scripture as Real Presence’ – As a Romanian Orthodox friend of mine puts it, ‘Everything is Eucharist’

    Grace to you

  27. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    Well said Byron. I was mainly alluding to the sacramental life that is communal, the Eucharistic worship in Church as opposed to the personal effort and 1-2-1, mystical time that appropriates the first.

  28. John Avatar
    John

    Father and all, thank you so much for the thoughts and replies. They mean very much to me, and I’ve been mulling over them these past few days. I hope and pray I can live-in to some of the truths you have written about and know them in the real way of knowing that Fr. Stephen describes.

    I understand (as best as I’m able) the emphasis on the fullness of the faith and of Christ’s life being one thing, not many small things accomplished piece-meal by different sacraments or actions. There is only one life in Christ, which is the life of the Church, which is both salvation and “the forgiveness of sins”, eternal life and love. All is the communion with God in Christ, and all of the sacraments are meant to pull us into, or open up, that communion with God.

    So, last thought/question: is the sacrament of ordination any different? As in, does ordination “accomplish” or “effect” something special, something specific that we can point to? (Yes, Paula, you understood me perfectly – I keep running back into this no-doubt-western idea of the sacraments’ “effectiveness”, so I’m trying to shake it, if that is indeed what is needed!)

  29. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    John,
    My late Archbishop (Dmitri of Dallas) once said to me, “Priests are born. Ordination simply reveals them to be what they are.” That was, perhaps, hyperbole, though it contained a very important thought. What is difficult in thinking about the sacraments is to tie them into a linear mode of time, cause and effect. We certainly experience things in that manner, to a great extent.

    One way to think about the sacraments is to read the text of the prayers used in their celebration. The prayers mean what they say. When, in the Eucharist, the priest says, “And make this bread to be…” it means just that. But to isolate that phrase and that moment from the rest of the service is a mistake (something commonly done in the West). In Anglicanism, if somehow the priest has failed to estimate the congregation’s size and he runs out of the consecrated bread, there is a simple formula, just a short paragraph, that is said over more bread and that serves as a consecration. Orthodoxy would never think of doing such a thing. Someone once said to me that the sentence of change should not be taken by itself. We live in a linear experience of time, and it takes time for us to say something, but the whole of the service is the saying of that one thing, even though the exact phrase will not come until nearly an hour or more into the service. The service is one thing – even though it fills a space of time.

    To a certain extent, it is also correct to say that the service began long before that. The very growing of the wheat and grapes, etc., through all that happens, including the baking (which is a big deal in Orthodoxy) have a participation in that single event of consecration.

    In ordination, we could think in the same way. But the prayer of ordination certainly occurs in a particular moment. Nevertheless, the one who is ordained, will likely, in time, come to see that his whole life was being revealed in that moment, that everything had always pointed to that moment, and that moment alone made sense of him. So, yes, the prayer of consecration (in all the sacraments) effects and accomplishes something – and we can point to it – but we should not ignore that what is accomplished extends outwards towards the fullness of what is consecrated – “filling all things.”

    I hope that helps and is not too vague.

    I’ll share a brief personal story. When I converted to Orthodoxy, I had been an Anglican priest for 18 years. I was immediately tasked by the bishop with serving as a lay pastor in directing and founding St. Anne, the parish that I have now served for 20 years. I was also immediately entered into a process of retraining and testing in preparation for ordination in the Orthodox Church. The Bishop was confronted with an interesting situation and I think he must have been concerned about our well-being.

    He said to me, “You will wear the cassock when you are in Church, and they are to address you as ‘Fr. Stephen.’” It was in that context that he added, “Priests are born, ordination simply reveals them to be what they are.”

    I cannot begin to express how important and helpful this was to me. I would have done anything I was asked by the bishop. I had nothing to defend in my former state. But in that single action, he redeemed the whole of my life, not dismissing what had gone before, though not claiming any particular sacramental status or efficacy in my Anglican ordination. It was a singular action, and another bishop, or the same bishop, might have handled the situation differently. It was a massive example of “economia.” I weep whenever I think of Vladyka’s kindness and generosity. He helped me to believe that God is good.

  30. Drewster2000 Avatar
    Drewster2000

    So Fr. Stephen,

    Playing devil’s advocate here, if you ran out of Eucharist bread, how would you handle it?

  31. Michael Bauman Avatar
    Michael Bauman

    Father, I have encountered people who simply seem unable to think in a non-linear manner. I do not know how to talk very well to these people about the faith. The connections that are natural to me don’t make sense to them. My own son is like that. Everything is a discreet action or choice leading in a specific direction. Any ideas?

  32. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    In Orthodox practice, you don’t handle it. You just run out.

  33. Drewster2000 Avatar
    Drewster2000

    I like that answer. It’s uncomfortable and risky (and I don’t like that), but it mirrors reality well. I’ve had the experience of having to run across the street right before the service to purchase the next best thing at the corner store in order to provide, but never that of simply running out. I suppose it’s best to learn to think on one’s feet and simply trust God for the words to say, the acts to fulfill when the time comes.

    Thanks for your honest answer.

  34. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    Drewster,
    The Orthodox cannot just dash out and get more bread. The Eucharistic bread has a careful preparation and baking that are, in many respects, as much a part of the service as the liturgy itself. The “whole” of the consecration is quite interesting. For example, the service book says, “Before serving the liturgy, a priest should be at peace with all people.” And it is quite possible that a priest might have to not serve if a problem should arise. I have politely warned my people that if you have a problem to take up with a priest, particularly something upsetting, it should be postponed until after the liturgy, lest everyone be made to suffer.

    Equally, the are dangers surrounding the preparation of the Liturgy. A priest has to work with a sharp knife in the ritual cutting and preparation. Should he knick himself and begin to bleed, he must stop and leave the altar. There can be no blood in the altar area. He has to tend to the injury until it is completely stanched. I’ve had this happen more than once…clumsy me.

    It is also interesting, that the canons direct that once the service has reached the Great Entrance (in which the bread and wine are brought to the altar and formally offered) it cannot stop. The Liturgy must be completed. I once had a situation in which an “upset” occurred during the Great Entrance itself. I pondered what to do. The upset would have been sufficient to cause me not to serve that day had it occurred before the service. As it was, it was too late. It was a very disconcerting day that has troubled me ever since.

    All of this points to the fact that the Liturgy is a “single thing.” The people are not disinterested watchers – a mere audience. They are full participants, and their thoughtless actions and reactions can be disastrous. Before the priest begins the Anaphora, the deacon cries out: “Let us stand aright! Let us stand with fear! Let us attend, that we may offer the holy oblation in peace.”

    Prior to that, during the Great Entrance itself, we sing, “Let us who mystically represent the cherubim and Let us who mystically represent the cherubim, and who sing the thrice-holy hymn to the life-creating Trinity, now lay aside all earthly cares that we may receive the King of all who comes invisibly born by the angelic hosts.”

    It is worth noting that the Creed is said after the Great Entrance, and is introduced with, “Let us love one another, that with one mind we may confess: Father, Son and Holy Spirit, the Trinity, one in essence and undivided.”

    People, I suspect, tend to ignore these lines, said as introductions to larger actions, but they define the very heart of what is taking place. The Creed cannot be rightly confessed, or believed, if we do not love one another. Faith without works is dead. The offering of the oblation (the Bloodless Sacrifice) must be done in peace. I am very clear with those who serve in the altar: there is no place whatsoever for anger in the altar. I have heard terrible, scandalous stories of hierarchs who famously behave in an imperious manner as though their ministry gave them permission to berate, belittle and employ angry rebukes. I’ll not cite any in particular. I will say that I’ve never served with anyone who behaved in such a manner. I would likely want to ask to be excused from serving. Frankly, I cannot understand how this is not obvious to every ordained man.

  35. Drewster2000 Avatar
    Drewster2000

    Fr. Stephen,

    I have a few thoughts in reply. They are crude generalizations and not meant to draw conclusions.

    If I look at extremes I find the West tends to be crass and flat, often with an ignorant disregard for hierarchy, honor, respect, etc. In the same view I find the East to be VERY much about these same things, almost without regard to their neighbor if he happens to hold no status in the particular proceedings. Continuing this generalization, the West errs toward the needs of the common people and the East errs toward all that is holy.

    I find no cause for ultimate blame because as fallen humans we always end up falling off on one side of the horse or the other, but I do find it interesting to see the outcomes when the two happen to meet:
    –What is the effect on the people when a portion of the congregation doesn’t get served?
    –What does it mean when something inexcusable happens after the Great Entrance begins?
    –What if the Great Entrance has started and you cut yourself?

    And of course the same kinds of questions could be posed to those practicing the Western rites, but I look forward to your…corrections. (grin)

  36. Nicholas Stephen Griswold Avatar
    Nicholas Stephen Griswold

    In light of the idea of running out, an anecdote from the recent past. Last spring I attended another parish as I was on a trip and I made Sunday liturgy. I was last in line and the priest was frantically fishing around in the chalice for the one remaining crumb of the Body (in that jurisdiction I can commune with the laity and not get vested which is why I chose to attend there…fewer things to pack and I did not want to push myself on the parish to commune at the altar. When I approached the Cup I identified myself and the priest said to me: “The Holy Deacon Nicholas will have to be patient while I try to find the last crumb.”

  37. Drewster2000 Avatar
    Drewster2000

    Dn. Nicholas,

    I agree with that sentiment. Basically we do the best we can given the situation – and God understands.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to blog via email

Support the work

Your generous support for Glory to God for All Things will help maintain and expand the work of Fr. Stephen. This ministry continues to grow and your help is important. Thank you for your prayers and encouragement!


Latest Comments

  1. Thank you for this lovely reflection, Father Stephen. My earliest memory, which was before I was walking so very early,…

  2. I found my self at St. Mary’s on Friday. I’m a Protestant and newly interested in Orthodoxy. I greatly enjoyed…

  3. There is a psychological method called Internal Family Systems, developed by Dr. Richard Schwartz. It addresses the various internal “parts…

  4. This is a wonderful conversation! Father, thank you for your reply; it is beautiful. I’ll add that I IM’d you…


Read my books

Everywhere Present by Stephen Freeman

Listen to my podcast



Categories


Archives