The Absence of Beauty

We can say without hesitation that God is the ultimate author of Beauty, and what we know and love of beauty is an echo or stronger of our desire for the Beautiful God. It becomes a major problem of sin, largely unrecognized, when beauty begins to recede from the consciousness of people, or something tawdry or ersatz becomes substituted for that which is beautiful.

We live, of course, in a culture which is predicated on mass production. Thus even within Orthodoxy we are driven towards mass production in an effort to economize and to satisfy ourselves with the same level of aesthetic that marks our culture (this is frequently true of icons in mission churches, including my own). I have had opportunity to see and worship in an environment marked by quality iconography and in a few cases, truly great icons.

I can recall being in a parish that has a particularly well-rendered “Rublev” Trinity (the three angels in the visit with Abraham) in the parish altar. I was officiating Vespers. As the sun began to set, the dying rays of the evening sun caught the icon and it began to “luminesce” in a manner I had only read about. The icon shone brightly with a light that appeared to come from within. This is not easily accomplished in the painting of an icon, but is certainly a proper goal of its execution. It is a revelation of the heavenly light (iconographically).

Both the orientation of the Church and the quality of its iconography became one with the service that was being offered and a beauty that is all too rare was revealed. There was nothing to be said, but as the choir sang, “O Gladsome Light,” the icon wordlessly proclaimed the same.

There is much in our life and culture that pushes us away from beauty. Mass production and the nature of our economy (marked by a level of productivity unknown in human history), are driven by questions other than beauty. Beauty has value as it can be marketed, but too often is absent in any depth from much of our experience. (I should add that the long-term goals of my parish include proper iconography and a temple that conforms to Orthodox architectural norms.)

Deeply distressing is the drive to “utility” in our lives. Value is given to that which is “useful.” Beauty thus becomes an avocation, a luxury not seen as useful or necessary to our existence. Of course, this is a deep miscalculation of the nature of human existence. Human beings do not exist well without beauty – and in most of human culture throughout most of human history, beauty has been valued beyond many of the things which we think of as “useful.”

A very sad existence indeed is a human life that has been reduced to utility but emptied of beauty.

The very presence of God brings beauty into the world, for God Himself is beautiful. As human art has revealed, even in the suffering of the Cross, God is beautiful.

I can recall some years ago chairing a committee of a parish that was in the process of interviewing architects (we were planning to build our first true “church”). One architect we interviewed shared the opinion that he thought churches historically had wasted a lot of money that could have better been spent on the poor. I do not hesitate in preaching our obligations to the poor, nor the need for us to tithe and give beyond ourselves. But I had no hesitancy in looking for a different architect. I daresay few architects would have said to a family whose house they were designing, “I think people have spent too much on building their homes and have neglected the poor.” It was churches that should be relegated to utility.

I strongly expect, because of the seamless garment of Christian theology, that someone who does not understand the necessity of beauty will not truly love the poor. For the poor must be treated not merely as the objects of our utility but the beautiful creations of God: anything less is not love.

I recall the title of Macolm Muggeridge’s wonderful book on Mother Teresa: Something Beautiful for God.

Yes. Yes, indeed.

Comments

  1. says

    Fr. Stephen,

    I love the line:

    “A very sad existence indeed is a human life that has been reduced to utility but emptied of beauty.”

    I shall have to ponder this more deeply.

    I am reminded of a quote by Rabbi Abraham J. Heschel taken from his wonderful book, God In Search of Man. He writes:

    “Among the many things that religious tradition holds in store for us is a legacy of wonder. The surest way to suppress our ability to understand the meaning of God and the importance of worship is to take things for granted. Indifference to the sublime wonder of living is the root of sin.”

    Once, when I was visiting a monastery in Iowa, New Melleray Abbey, one of the monks, a priest, said, “Indeed, beauty is God’s humility.” Later, I repeated these words to another brother who simply smiled and said, “Hmm, I would have said that humility is God’s beauty.” His words made me grin!

  2. Karen C says

    Dear Father, a recent blog “conversation” with an self-proclaimed evangelist who preferred to use the comments section of another’s blog site to “preach the gospel” than to actually converse and relate reminded me of a how this utilitarian mentality insidiously infected our expectations of ourselves and others in my former evangelical Christian subculture. Depending on the church or group at hand, blatantly or subtly the bottom line of all preaching and teaching to those already believers tended to be “your ultimate purpose here on earth (and for becoming “holy”) is getting others ‘saved’ or otherwise influencing others for Christ.” Implicit in this assumption was that our real value to God and in the Church is our “tool” value. Subtly or blatantly, the focus of our daily “walk with Christ” became our spiritual performance or productivity, not the healing and transformation of our hearts and our real communion with Christ. I had not before consciously reflected on how a utilitarian attitude toward the meaning of the Church and the consequent devaluing of beauty in worship go hand in hand with a deperson